Filmmaker Aditya Dhar has reportedly issued a legal notice to writer Santosh Kumar RS after the latter accused the makers of Dhurandhar 2 of copying his script. The controversy has sparked a fresh debate around originality and intellectual property in the film industry.
Aditya Dhar to go the legal route
According to reports, Santosh Kumar RS had earlier alleged that the storyline of Dhurandhar 2 was lifted from a script he had written in 2023. He claimed that he had registered the script with the Screenwriters Association and had also pitched it to several production houses while trying to develop the project.
The writer further stated that he realised the similarities only after watching the film, which has emerged as a major box office success. He alleged that key elements of the narrative closely resembled his original work and claimed to have supporting documents, including registration records and email communications, to back his case.
However, the situation appears to have escalated, with Aditya Dhar now taking legal action against the accusations. As per reports, a notice has been sent to Santosh Kumar RS, challenging his claims and seeking clarification over the allegations made in public forums. The move indicates that the filmmaker is strongly contesting the plagiarism charges.
The controversy has unfolded at a time when Dhurandhar 2 is enjoying massive commercial success and widespread attention. The film, starring Ranveer Singh, has been praised for its scale and storytelling, even as it continues to face scrutiny over its themes and narrative choices.
All about the controversy
Industry insiders suggest that such disputes are not uncommon in filmmaking, especially in large-scale projects where multiple ideas and scripts are in circulation. However, legal escalations like this highlight the growing importance of protecting creative ownership and ensuring transparency in the development process.
While Santosh Kumar RS has maintained that his claims are backed by evidence, the makers of Dhurandhar 2 have not publicly accepted any wrongdoing. Instead, the legal notice signals a pushback against what they may view as baseless allegations.
As the matter develops, it could potentially move into a prolonged legal battle, depending on how both parties proceed. The case also underscores the challenges faced by writers in safeguarding their work in a highly competitive industry.
With both sides standing firm, the dispute is likely to draw continued attention, especially given the film’s high profile and ongoing success at the box office.
